April 14, 2012
After we developed a method for detecting formylpeptide chemotaxis receptors using autoradiography, we adapted this method to examine these binding sites or receptors in gut tissue. We exposed freshly harvested segments of guinea pig ileum to iodinated formylhexapeptide, fixed and processed the tissue histologically, and then did autoradiography to localize the radiolabeled peptide in the tissue sections.
Formylpeptide chemoattractants are known to be capable
of eliciting contraction of smooth muscle in guinea pig ileum but the cellular target
of interaction between peptide and ileum is unknown. This suggests that receptors specific for
formylpeptides may be found on cells in the ileum and may be responsible for
ileal smooth muscle contraction. Formylpeptides
may bind directly to ileal smooth muscle and thereby elicit its contraction. Alternatively, they may act on smooth muscle
indirectly by first binding to and stimulating enteric nerves or activating inflammatory
cells (macrophages, polymorphonuclear leukocytes, lymphocytes). Secondary to this, soluble mediators such as neurotransmitters
(eg., acetylcholine, substance P) or arachidonate metabolites may be released
resulting in smooth muscle contraction.
This study was performed to localize the sites of
formylpeptide binding in guinea pig ileum.
Using iodinated formylhexapeptide in conjunction with light microscope
autoradiography of sectioned ileum, it appears that formylpeptide binds specifically
and in relatively large amounts directly to ileal smooth muscle (muscularis
externa and muscularis mucosa). However,
very little receptor-mediated binding to enteric nerve plexuses, lamina
propria, infiltrating leukocytes, or ileal epithelium was observed.
Since formylpeptides are produced in prodigious quantities by bacteria, the release of these peptides in or around the gut may trigger increased smooth muscle contractility. This may promote both normal
gut motility and the augmented motility associated with enteric infections.
Below is the full text of this paper and a link to the paper in PDF format.
Formylpeptide Chemoattractant Binding in Ileum
Formylpeptide Chemoattractant Binding in Ileum
Localization of Formylpeptide Chemoattractant Binding Sites
in Guinea Pig Ileum
by
Robert J. Walter*
Department of Anatomy
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, IL
60612
Wayne A. Marasco
Department of Pathology
University of Michigan Medical School
Ann
Arbor,
MI
Running
Head: Formylpeptide Binding in Guinea Pig Ileum
Keywords
- formylpeptide, chemoattractant, chemotaxis, smooth muscle, ileum,
contractility, receptors, bacterial peptides.
*
To whom reprint requests should be addressed:
Robert J. Walter,
Ph.D.
Department
of Anatomy m/c 512
University of Illinois at Chicago
P.O. Box
6998
Chicago, IL
60680
312/996-9464
ABSTRACT
Formylpeptide chemoattractants are known to be capable
of eliciting contraction of smooth muscle in guinea pig ileum but the cellular target
of interaction between peptide and ileum is unknown. To directly ascertain sites for binding and
uptake of formylpeptide, we have exposed segments of guinea pig ileum to
N-formyl-norleucyl-leucyl-phenylalanyl-norleucyl-I125-tyrosyl-lysine
(10 nM), at either 4ºC or 37ºC. After
this initial incubation, the tissue was rinsed in buffer, fixed, embedded,
sectioned (at 3 µm thickness), and autoradiographed. Developed autoradiographs were examined and silver
grains associated with different regions of ileum quantitated. At both temperatures the smooth muscle layers
(outer longitudinal muscle, inner circular muscle, and muscularis mucosa) were
heavily labeled with silver grains. Very
few grains were found to be associated with the epithelial cells of the
intestinal villi. At 4ºC, very few
grains were observed overlying enteric nerve plexuses, whereas these structures
were heavily labeled in ileum exposed to I125-hexapeptide at 37ºC. In control experiments performed at 4ºC where
iodinated and excess unlabeled hexapeptide were added simultaneously, labeling was
markedly reduced in all regions of ileum.
Similarly, in control experiments
performed at 37ºC, labeling was also reduced but not to the same extent as that
observed at 4ºC. We conclude from these
studies that formylhexapeptide chemoattractants bind specifically and in large amounts
to receptors on ileal smooth muscle but not to enteric nerve plexuses. As demonstrated previously, this binding is
receptor-mediated and may directly induce ileal smooth muscle contraction. The occurrence of such binding sites on ileal
smooth muscle may promote both normal gut motility and the augmented motility
associated with enteric infections.
Keywords
- formylpeptide, chemoattractant, chemotaxis, smooth muscle, ileum,
contractility, receptors, bacterial peptides.
INTRODUCTION
There
are several classes of compounds that elicit potent secretory and chemotactic responses
from normal polymorphonuclear (PMN) and mononuclear leukocytes. Of these, the formylmethionylpeptides and the
complement cleavage products are by far the most fully characterized. The formylpeptides are a group of low
molecular weight oligopeptides found in bacteria (Snyderman and Pike, 1984a, b)
and mitochondria (Carp, 1982). Purified
synthetic analogs of these naturally occurring substances have been synthesized
and their leukotactic activities characterized (Snyderman and Pike, 1984a, b; Marasco
et al., 1984; Miyake et al., 1983). C5a,
a fragment of the fifth component of complement, is the major source of
chemotactic activity found in serum (Snyderman et al., 1971).
In leukocytes, the responses elicited by both classes
of chemoattractant compounds are known to be mediated by cell surface receptors
specific for each class of attractant. Furthermore,
both types of chemoattractants have been shown to be capable of initiating the
contraction of smooth muscle and are potent spasmogenic agents in both guinea
pig ileum and lung (Rocha e Silva et al., 1951; Stimler et al., 1981; Regal and
Pickering, 1981;
Hamel et al., 1984). The
structure-activity relationships (i.e., relative potencies) for a series of related,
synthetic N-formylpeptides in initiating ileal smooth muscle contraction are very
similar to those seen for leukocyte chemotaxis.
In addition, the competitive formylpeptide receptor antagonist, Boc-Phe-Leu-Phe-Leu-Phe
inhibited the ileal contractile response to formylpeptide (Marasco et al.,
1982). This suggests that receptors
specific for formylpeptides may be found on cells in the ileum and may be
responsible for ileal smooth muscle contraction. However, formylpeptide binding to these
receptors may directly or indirectly elicit smooth muscle contraction. Formylpeptides may bind directly to ileal smooth
muscle and thereby elicit its contraction.
Alternatively, they may act on smooth muscle indirectly by first binding
to and stimulating enteric nerves or activating inflammatory cells
(macrophages, polymorphonuclear leukocytes, lymphocytes). Secondary to this, soluble mediators such as neurotransmitters
(eg., acetylcholine, substance P) or arachidonate metabolites may be released
resulting in smooth muscle contraction.
This study was performed to localize the sites of
formylpeptide binding in guinea pig ileum.
Using iodinated formylhexapeptide in conjunction with light microscope
autoradiography of sectioned ileum, it appears that formylpeptide binds specifically
and in relatively large amounts directly to ileal smooth muscle (muscularis
externa and muscularis mucosa). However,
very little receptor-mediated binding to enteric nerve plexuses, lamina
propria, infiltrating leukocytes, or ileal epithelium was observed.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Tissue Isolation
Adult
male guinea pigs were anesthetized with ether and 3 cm of terminal ileum
isolated and flushed several times with cold Krebs solution (130 mM NaCl, 4.7
mM KCl, 1.18 mM KH2PO4, 1.17 mM MgSO4.7H2O,
1.6 mM CaCl2, 14.9 mM NaHCO3, 5.5 mM dextrose, 2 mg/ml
bovine serum albumin). The isolated ileum
was cut into 2 mm long pieces, suspended in Krebs solution and allowed to
equilibrate for 60 min at 37ºC in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 / 95% air
with several changes of buffer.
Hexapeptide Binding
Conditions
N-formyl-norleucyl-leucyl-phenylalanyl-norleucyl-tyrosyl-lysine
(Peninsula Laboratories, Belmont,
CA) was iodinated by the chloramine-T
method using carrier-free I125 as described previously (Marasco et al.,
1985a: Jesaitis et al., 1983, 1984). After
equilibration in Krebs buffer at 37ºC, segments of ileum were exposed to 10 nM I125-hexapeptide
at 4ºC or 37ºC for either 3 or 30 min. Excess
(500-fold) unlabeled hexapeptide was added simultaneously with I125-hexapeptide
to one group of tissue samples so that they might serve as controls for
nonspecific hexapeptide binding. It should
be noted that buffer containing formylhexapeptide was in contact with both the
serosal and luminal aspects as well as the cut ends of each ileal segment
providing a large surface area for entry of this peptide into each segment.
Upon
completion of this incubation, ileal segments were rinsed thoroughly in two changes
of Krebs solution (4ºC) containing 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin and a final
wash in Krebs solution lacking albumin. This
washing was accomplished in 60 seconds whereupon ileal segments were promptly
fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde, 1% paraformaldehyde, 0.1 M cacodylate, pH 7.4 for
18 hours at 4ºC.
Tissue Preparation and
Autoradiography
Fixed
ileal segments were rinsed in cacodylate buffer (0.1 M) and dehydrated in graded
ethanol series. Tissue was then embedded
in glycol methacrylate (DuPont Instruments, Newtown, CT)
and each tissue block trimmed to a depth of approximately 0.5 mm before
sectioning was commenced. Cross-sections
of ileum were then cut at 3 µm thickness and sections mounted on acid-cleaned, subbed
glass slides. Slides with adherent
sections were then dipped in Kodak NTB-2 emulsion (diluted 1:3 with distilled water),
air dried, and stored for 14 days in the dark at 4ºC. Exposed autoradiographs were developed using
Kodak D-19, fixed, stained with 0.1% cresyl violet, and coverglasses mounted
using Permount.
Specimens
were examined and photographed using a Nikon Optiphot microscope equipped with
an Olympus OM-2n camera. Bright-field optics were used to identify the
specific regions of interest and dark-field optics used to visualize and count
silver grains associated with these regions.
Silver grains were counted using an eyepiece reticle at 100X magnification. The reticle grid divided the field into 27 by
27 µm squares. Grains within 10 such squares
overlying each of the regions of interest were then counted. The regions examined included: muscularis
externa, both outer longitudinal and inner circular layers; submucosa; muscularis
mucosa; epithelial cells (villi and crypts); and the lumen. Three separate experiments were performed, the
data from these experiments combined, and the mean number of grains/test area ±
S.E.M calculated.
RESULTS
Background and Specificity
of Labeling
The
emulsion background seen over the lumen was very low (usually less than 1 grain
per unit test area = 729 µm2) and only a small percentage (less than
5%) of the total amount of binding seen in the muscle layers (Table 1). Ileal segments exposed to I125-hexapeptide
in the presence of excess unlabeled hexapeptide exhibited some non-specific binding
of labeled hexapeptide within the ileum (3-4 grains/ 729 µm2). However, in the muscle layers of the ileum a
high degree of specific labeling, 3 to 5 times as many specific as non-specific
grains, was evident.
The
non-specific binding observed in these experiments could be reduced
considerably by extending the time of washing after the initial formylpeptide binding
(data not shown) but the total amount of specific labeling was also greatly
reduced. Thus, the background labeling
probably results from residual unbound I125-hexapeptide not removed during
the washing procedure. However, since
hexapeptide binding to the leukocyte formylpeptide receptor is known to be
highly reversible (Sklar et al., 1984) longer washings might remove significant
amounts of receptor-bound I125-hexapeptide. As a result a tissue background level of 3-4
grains per test area was tolerated in order to maintain maximal specific binding
of hexapeptide.
The
amount of non-specific labeling seen in ileal segments exposed to I125-hexapeptide
at 37ºC was much higher than that seen at 4ºC (Table 2). At low temperatures, labeling is due
primarily to specific receptor-mediated binding of formylhexapeptide to the
cell surface. Although not significant
at 4ºC, fluid-phase endocytosis becomes a major route of internalization at 37ºC. Thus, 5 to 15 grains/ 729 µm2 were
seen over the smooth muscle layers at 37ºC even in the presence of excess
unlabeled hexapeptide. Much of this
labeling is probably due to a combination of fluid-phase and receptor-mediated
endocytosis of I125-hexapeptide.
Localization of
Hexapeptide Binding
The
amount of specific binding increased markedly (50-100%) in samples of tissue
exposed to I125-hexapeptide for 30 min at 4ºC as compared to 3 min at
4ºC (Figures 1 and 2). This reflects a
move towards equilibrium binding. However,
a greater increase in binding occurred in deeper layers of the ileum than in
the superficial layers (46%, 67%, and 106% in the outer longitudinal, inner
circular, and muscularis mucosa, respectively) after 30 minutes. Thus, the tissue mass or intercellular
junctions evidently created a significant barrier to the diffusion and binding
of formylpeptide at the early time point.
Nevertheless, labeled hexapeptide had penetrated the deepest layers
(i.e., muscularis mucosa and submucosa) within three minutes and had bound
extensively in all muscle layers within 30 minutes. Non-specific binding was not significantly different
at these two incubation times.
I125-labeled
formylpeptide was localized primarily over the longitudinal and circular smooth
muscle layers as well as the muscularis mucosa.
The labeling seen associated with smooth muscle was associated primarily
with the cell surface rather than intracellular organelles or cytoplasm (Figure
3 A-D). Little or no specific binding
was found over the submucosa or ileal epithelial cells. PMN, eosinophils, lymphocytes, and tissue macrophages
were seen occasionally in the lamina propria and blood vessels, but very little
binding was seen compared to that observed on smooth muscle (Figure 3 E,F). Furthermore, very little binding to
Auerbach`s or Meissner`s plexuses was observed at 4ºC (see Figure 1 at arrows) and
very few grains were associated with smooth muscle in blood vessel walls.
The
amount of label seen in tissue exposed to I125-hexapeptide at 37ºC was
increased compared to that seen in parallel incubations at 4ºC (Table 2). Labeling was increased up to 150% in tissue
samples exposed to iodinated hexapeptide for 30 min as compared to 3 min at 37ºC. Non-specific labeling (Figures 4 and 5) was
considerably higher at 37ºC than at 4ºC and comprised a large portion (50-80 %
in the muscularis externa) of the total labeling observed at 37ºC. Specific labeling was seen in ileal smooth
muscle layers (muscularis externa and muscularis mucosa) but far less label was
associated with the epithelial cell layer.
At 37ºC, large amounts of label were associated with Auerbach`s and
Meissner`s nerve plexuses (see Figures 4 and 5). This labeling was not reduced in the presence
of excess unlabeled hexapeptide and was thus considered to be the result of fluid-phase
endocytosis of I125-hexapeptide.
Samples of terminal guinea pig ileum exposed to hexapeptide at 37ºC also
contracted in response to the binding or uptake of formylpeptide as described
previously by Marasco et al. (1982).
DISCUSSION
This
study shows that iodinated formylhexapeptide binds primarily to the outer
longitudinal and inner circular muscle layers and the muscularis mucosa of the
guinea pig ileum. Binding appears to be
specific for smooth muscle in these layers since even neighboring vascular
smooth muscle does not bind formylpeptide.
In addition,formylpeptide exhibits little or no specific binding to
absorptive or secretory cells found in the intestinal epithelium. Very little specific binding to infiltrating leukocytes
or intravascular leukocytes was detected under the conditions employed for
these experiments. Thus, the possibility
that formylpeptides may induce the release of soluble mediators of ileal
contraction from leukocytes seems remote.
This relative paucity of binding also suggests that the numbers or
binding affinities of formylpeptide receptors present on the smooth muscle
cells may be higher than those on leukocytes.
Alternatively, the formylpeptide receptors of infiltrating leukocytes
may be blocked or down-regulated due to local, endogenous factors.
Marasco
et al. (1982) found formylpeptides to be potent spasmogenic agents for guinea
pig ileum. However the response (eg., contour
of dose-response curves, latency period, tachyphylaxis) of ileum to these
peptides differed significantly from that of ileum to substance P or histamine. This suggests that formylpeptides and
structurally-related neuropeptides such as substance P may interact with the
ileum by way of distinctly different mechanisms. The occurrence and physiologic activities of
substance P as well as tissue distribution of substance P receptors have been
characterized in considerable detail (Souquet et al., 1985; Regoli et al.,
1984; Costa et al., 1982; Holzer and Petsche, 1983). Substance P receptors have been demonstrated
on ileal smooth muscle as well as enteric nerve plexuses (Costa et al., 1982). The effects of substance P on smooth muscle
contraction are thought to be mediated by endogenous agents such as acetylcholine,
prostaglandins, or histamine.
On
the other hand, we have found that iodinated formylpeptide binds with great
specificity to smooth muscle but does not
bind to enteric nerve plexuses at 4ºC.
At 37ºC, however, formylpeptide is taken up by these plexuses in large
amounts. It is possible that this
internalized peptide may elicit subsequent effects on ileal smooth muscle
innervated by these nerves but there is no direct evidence that this does occur. However, the absence of receptor sites
specific for formylpeptide on these plexuses (as seen at 4ºC) would argue
against such a mechanism. Substances internalized
by bulk fluid pinocytosis are generally targeted for lysosomal destruction (Farquhar,
1983; DeDuve and Wattiaux, 1966) and are therefore not likely to evoke rapid, specific
cellular responses of the sort typified by cell surface receptor-mediated
phenomena. The occurrence of very
abundant cell surface receptors specific for formylpeptide on cells in the
smooth muscle layers indicates that these peptides may exert a direct effect on
smooth muscle in these regions.
Normally,
resident intestinal flora continually produce and release small quantities of
formylpeptides into the gut lumen (Marasco et al., 1984; Miyake et al., 1983). Magnusson et al. (1985) have demonstrated that formylpeptides infused
intraluminally greatly increase the permeability of ileal epithelia for low
molecular weight substances. Under physiological
conditions, this may allow bacterial formylpeptides to penetrate the epithelium
more readily and bind directly to ileal smooth muscle. This would then result in increased smooth
muscle contraction and perhaps help to maintain the normal motility of the gut. The observation that germ-free mice exhibit greatly
reduced transit of intraluminal radiotracers lends further credulity to this
hypothesis (Abrams and Bishop, 1967). Under
certain pathological conditions involving the gut such as enteric bacterial
infections, peristaltic rates and smooth muscle contraction are often
dramatically increased. Under these circumstances,
large quantities of bacterial formylpeptides may be elaborated and released into
the gut lumen. These peptides may then
penetrate into the muscular layers of the gut and act there to vastly augment
the usual contractility of intestinal smooth muscle.
From
this data and other studies, we conclude that synthetic formylpeptides can increase
the permeability of the intestinal epithelium, penetrate that epithelium, bind
to ileal smooth muscle, and elicit increased smooth muscle contraction. Since these formylpeptides are synthetic analogs
of naturally occurring bacterial peptides, we speculate that intraluminal bacteria
may release similar factors that subsequently affect intestinal contractility.
TABLE I
Silver Grains Associated with Guinea Pig Ileum after
Exposure to
I125-Hexapeptide at 4ºC
Layer
of Ileum I125-Hexapeptide I125-Hexapeptide
+
Unlabeled Hexapeptide
3 min 30 min 3
min 30 min
______________________________________________________________________
Muscle
Outer longitudinal 10.8 ± 1.6* 15.8
±1.4** 3.0 ±0.5 3.2 ±0.6
Inner circular
11.0 ±1.2** 20.1 ±1.3** 3.0 ±0.5 3.5 ±0.8
Submucosa 4.0 ±1.3 6.7 ±1.5 3.7 ±0.5 4.2 ±0.7
Muscularis
mucosa 8.0
±1.4** 16.5 ±1.8* 3.7
±0.6 4.2 ±0.7
Epithelial
cells
(Villi and crypts) 2.0
±0.5 2.2 ±0.5 0.7
±0.3 1.0 ±0.3
Lumen 0.7
±0.3 1.0 ±0.2 0.7
±0.3 0.8 ±0.3
______________________________________________________________________
2
mm segments of ileum exposed to 10 nM I125-hexapeptide in Krebs
buffer at 4ºC, rinsed rapidly through 3 changes of Krebs buffer at 4ºC and then
fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde with 1% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer,
pH 7.4 overnight. To control for
nonspecific binding, tissue was exposed to 10 nM I125-hexapeptide
containing 5 µM unlabeled hexapeptide.
Tissue
was dehydrated in ethanol series, embedded in glycol methacrylate, cut into 3 µm
thick sections, coated with Kodak NTB-2 emulsion, and exposed in the dark at 4ºC
for 14 days. Autoradiographs were
developed in Kodak D-19, stained in cresyl violet, and mounted in Permount.
Silver
grains were counted using a reticle at 100X magnification. Grains within a 27 by 27 µm square were
counted overlying each of the regions designated above and 10 squares were counted
for each region. Three separate experiments
were performed. Each entry represents
the mean ± SEM for three experiments.
Grain
counts for I125-hexapeptide compared to I125-hexapeptide +
excess unlabeled hexapeptide at equivalent times using 2-tailed t-test; * p <
0.03 ; ** p < 0.005
TABLE II
Silver Grains Associated with Guinea Pig Ileum after
Exposure to
I125-Hexapeptide at 37ºC
Layer
of Ileum I125-Hexapeptide I125-Hexapeptide +
Unlabeled
Hexapeptide
3 min 30 min 3
min 30 min
______________________________________________________________________
Muscle
Outer longitudinal 16.2 ± 2.1 23.0
± 2.8* 5.0
± 1.1 11.5 ± 2.5
Inner circular
9.7
± 1.3 21.2 ± 3.1 8.0
± 2.8 15.5 ± 3.3
Submucosa 4.2 ± 1.0 5.0
± 1.5 6.0
± 2.2 7.7 ± 2.1
Muscularis
mucosa 8.0
± 1.5 20.2 ± 3.7 7.2 ± 1.8 10.5 ± 2.6
Epithelial
cells
(Villi and crypts) 3.0 ± 0.5 5.0
± 0.3 2.5
± 0.5 4.0 ± 1.0
Lumen 0.7
± 0.3 0.5
± 0.2 1.0
± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.4 ______________________________________________________________________
2
mm segments of ileum exposed to 10 nM I125-hexapeptide in Krebs buffer
at 37ºC, rinsed rapidly through 3 changes of Krebs buffer at 4ºC and then fixed
in 2% glutaraldehyde with 1% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH
7.4 overnight. To control for
nonspecific binding, tissue was exposed to 10 nM I125-hexapeptide
containing 5 µM unlabeled hexapeptide.
Tissue
was dehydrated in ethanol series, embedded in glycol methacrylate, cut into 3 µm
thick sections, coated with Kodak NTB-2 emulsion, and exposed in the dark at 4ºC
for 14 days. Autoradiographs were
developed in Kodak D-19, stained in cresyl violet, and mounted in Permount.
Silver
grains were counted using a reticle at 100X magnification. Grains within a 27 by 27 µm square were
counted overlying each of the regions designated above and 10 squares were counted
for each region. Three separate experiments
were performed. Each entry represents the
mean
SEM
for three experiments.
Grain
counts for I125-hexapeptide compared to I125-hexapeptide +
excess unlabeled hexapeptide at equivalent times using 2-tailed t-test; * p <
0.04
REFERENCES
ABRAMS,
G.D. and BISHOP, J.E. 1967. Effect
of normal microbial flora on gastrointestinal motility. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 126:
301-304.
ASWANIKUMAR,
S., CORCORAN, B., SCHIFFMAN, E., DAY, A.R., FREER, R.J.,
SHOWELL,
H.J., and PERT, C.B. 1977. Demonstration of a receptor on rabbit
neutrophils for chemotactic peptides. Biochem. Biophys.
Res. Commun. 74: 810-825.
BECKER,
E.L. AND MARASCO, W.A. 1985. Chemotaxis
and activation of neutrophils. In
"Symposium on Chemical Mediators of Inflammation". Cohen, S., Hayashi, H., Saito, K., and Takado,
A., eds. Academic Press (in press).
CARP,
H. 1982.
Mitochondrial N-formyl methionyl proteins as chemoattractants for
neutrophils. J. Exp. Med. 155: 264-273.
COSTA,
M., FURNESS, J.B., FRANCO, R., LLEWELLYN-SMITH, I.,
MURPHY, R., and
BEARDSLEY,
A.M. 1982. Substance P in nerve tissue in the gut. in, "Substance P in the Nervous
System", Porter, R. and O`Connor, M. (eds.), London, Pitman Books Ltd. pp. 129-144.
DEDUVE,
C. and WATTIAUX, R. 1966. Function
of lysosomes. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 28:435-492.
FARQUHAR,
M.G. 1983. Multiple pathways of exocytosis, endocytosis,
and membrane recycling: validation of a Golgi route. Fed. Proc. 42:2407-2413.
FERTUCK,
H.C. and SALPETER, M.M. 1974. Sensitivity
in electron microscope autoradiography for I-125. J. Histochem. Cytochem.
22: 80-87.
GALLIN,
J.I., SELIGMANN, B.E., and FLETCHER, M.P.
1983. Dynamics of human
neutrophil receptors for the chemoattractant fmet-leu-phe. Agents Actions Suppl.) 12: 290-308.
HAMEL,
R., FORD-HUTCHINSON, A.W., LORD, A, and CIRINO, M. 1984. Bronchoconstriction
induced by N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine in the guinea pig:
involvement of arachidonic acid metabolites.
Prostaglandins 28: 43-56.
HOLZER,
P. and PETSCHE, U. 1983. On
the mechanism of contraction and desensitization induced by substance P in the
intestinal muscle in the guinea-pig. J. Physiol.
342:549-568.
MAGNUSSON,
K.-E., DAHLGREN, C., and SJOLANDER, A. 1985. Effect of N-formylated methionyl-phenylalanine
(FMP) and methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (FMLP) on gut permeability. Inflammation 9:365-373.
MARASCO,
W.A., BECKER, K.A., FELTNER, D.E., BROWN, C.S., WARD, P.A. and
NAIRN,
R. 1985.
Covalent affinity labeling, detergent solubilization, and fluid-phase characterization
of the rabbit neutrophil formyl peptide chemotaxis receptor. Biochem.
24: 2227-2236.
MARASCO,
W.A., FANTONE, J.C., and WARD, P.A. 1982. Spasmogenic activity of
chemotactic
N-formylated oligopeptides: Identity of structure-function relationships for
chemotactic and spasmogenic activities. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 79:7470-7473.
MARASCO,
W.A., PHAN, S.H., KRUTZSCH, H., SHOWELL, H.J., FELTNER, D.E.,
NAIRN,
R., BECKER, E.L., and WARD, P.A. 1984. Purification and identification of
formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine as the major peptide neutrophil
chemotactic factor produced by Escherichia
coli. J. Biol. Chem. 259: 5430-5439.
MIYAKE,
Y., TADASHI, Y., KAZUHIRO, F., SUGINAKA, H., NAKAJIMA, T., and
MORIYAMA,
T. 1983.
Purification and characterization of neutrophil chemotactic factors of Streptococcus sanguis. Biochimica Biophysica Acta 758: 181-186.
NIEDEL,
J.E. and CUATRECASAS, P. 1980. Formyl
peptide chemotactic receptors of leukocytes and macrophages. Curr. Top. Cell. Regul. 17: 137-170.
NIEDEL,
J., WILKINSON, S., AND CUATRACASAS, P. 1979. Receptor-mediated uptake of I-125-chemotactic
peptide by human neutrophils. J. Biol. Chem. 254: 10700-10708.
REGAL,
J.F. and PICKERING, R.J. 1981. C5a
and antigen-induced tracheal contraction: effect of a combination of an
antihistamine and cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors.
J. Immunol. 126: 313-316.
ROCHA
DE SILVA, M., BIER, O., and ARONSON, M. 1951. Histamine release by anaphylatoxin. Nature (London)
168: 465-466.
SALPETER,
M.M., FERTUCK, H.C., and SALPETER, E.E. 1977. Resolution in electron microscope
autoradiography. III. Iodine-125, the effect of heavy metal
staining, and a reassessment of critical parameters. J. Cell
Biol. 72: 161-173.
SCHIFFMAN,
E. and GALLIN, J.I. 1979. Biochemistry
of phagocyte chemotaxis. Curr. Top. Cell. Regul.
15: 203-261.
SKLAR,
L.A., FINNEY,
D.A., OATES, Z.G., JESAITIS, A.J., PAINTER, R.G., and COCHRANE, C.G. 1984. The
dynamics of ligand-receptor interactions.
Real-time analysis of dissociation, and internalization of an N-formyl peptide
and its receptors on the human neutrophil.
J. Biol. Chem. 259:5661-5669.
SNYDERMAN,
R., PHILLIPS, J.K., and MERGENHAGEN, S.E.
1971. Biological activity of complement
in vivo: Role of C5 in the accumulation of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in inflammatory
exudates. J. Exp. Med. 134:1131-1143.
SNYDERMAN,
R. and PIKE, M.C. 1984a.
Chemoattractant receptors on phagocytic cells. Ann. Rev. Immunol.
2: 257-281.
SNYDERMAN,
R. and PIKE, M.C. 1984b. Transductional mechanisms of chemoattractant
receptors on leukocytes. Contemp. Top. Immunobiol. 14: 1-28.
SOUQUET,
J.C., GRIDER, J.R., BITAR, K.N., and MAKLOUF, G.M. 1985. Receptors
for mammalian tachykinins on isolated intestinal smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol.
249:G533-G538.
STIMLER,
N.P., BROCKLEHURST, W.E., BLOOR, C.M., and HUGLI, T.E. 1981.
Anaphylatoxin-mediated
contraction of guinea pig lung strips: a nonhistamine tissue response. J. Immunol.
126: 2258-2261.
WALTER, R.J. and MARASCO, W.A. 1984. Localization
of chemotactic peptide receptors on rabbit neutrophils. Exp. Cell
Res. 154: 613-618.
WILLIAMS,
L.T., SNYDERMAN, R., PIKE, M.C., AND LEFKOWITZ, R.J. 1977. Specific
receptor sites for chemotactic peptides on human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 74: 1204-1208.
FIGURES
Figure 1. Guinea pig ileum exposed to 10 nM I125-hexapeptide
at 4ºC for 3 min, washed for 1 min in Krebs solution, and then fixed. Bright-field images of ileal cross-sections
(3µm thick) are seen in the left column and corresponding dark-field images in
the right. Many silver grains are seen
overlying both layers of the muscularis externa (A,B), both outer longitudinal
muscle (olm) and inner circular muscle (icm).
In addition, a number of grains are also seen over the muscularis mucosa
(mm). Auerbach`s plexus (indicated by
arrows) is virtually without associated silver grains except at its very
periphery. Very few grains are seen associated
with the epithelial cells of the ileum (C,D) and even fewer in the lumen. Control tissue exposed simultaneously to 10
nM iodinated hexapeptide and 5 µM unlabeled hexapeptide (E,F) shows a great
reduction in the number of silver grains.
Magnification bar = 100 µm.
Figure 2. Guinea pig ileum exposed to 10 nM I125-hexapeptide
at 4ºC for 30 min, rinsed in Krebs solution at 4ºC for 1 min, and then fixed. Three micrometer thick cross-sections of
ileum (bright-field, left column; corresponding dark-field, right column) show
many silver grains (A,B) associated with the outer longitudinal and inner
circular muscle layers (olm and icm, respectively) and also with the muscularis
mucosa (mm). Very few grains are seen in
association with the lamina propria or with the epithelial cell layer (C,D).
Under
similar conditions, ileal segments exposed to iodinated hexapeptide
simultaneously with excess (500-fold) unlabeled hexapeptide show comparatively
very few grains overlying the smooth muscle layers (E,F). An unlabeled Auerbach`s plexus is also seen
(arrow). Magnification bar = 100 µm.
Figure 3. Ileum initially exposed to I125-hexapeptide
for 30 min at 4ºC, rinsed, fixed, and cross-sectioned. At high magnification, cells in both the
outer longitudinal (A,B) and inner circular (C, D) muscle layers exhibit silver
grains localized on the muscle plasma membrane.
Perivascular tissue macrophage found in the lamina propria (E, F)
displays prominent granular cytoplasmic inclusions (dense by bright-field and refractile
by dark-field) but no silver grains indicating a lack of I125-hexapeptide
binding. Magnification bar = 15 µm.
Figure 4. Guinea pig ileum exposed to 10 nM I125-hexapeptide
for 3 min at 37ºC, rinsed in Krebs solution for 1 min at 4ºC, and then fixed. Cross-sectioned ileum (bright-field, left
column; corresponding dark-field, right column) shows a great many silver
grains (A,B) overlying the outer longitudinal muscle (olm) as well as the inner
circular muscle (icm) layers. In addition,
many grains are seen overlying the Auerbach`s plexus (arrow) beneath the outer
longitudinal muscle layer. Few grains
are seen overlying the epithelial cells and very few over the lumen (C,D).
Ileal
segments exposed simultaneously to iodinated and excess unlabeled hexapeptide for
3 min at 37ºC display considerable numbers of silver grains associated with the
muscularis externa (E,F). Magnification
bar = 100 µm.
Figure 5. Segments of guinea pig ileum exposed to I125-hexapeptide
for 30 min at 37ºC, rinsed in Krebs solution for 1 min at 4ºC, and then fixed. Cross-sectioned ileum (bright-field, left column;
corresponding dark-field, right column) display large numbers of grains over the
muscularis externa (outer longitudinal and inner circular layers; olm and icm, respectively),
muscularis mucosa (mm), and Auerbach`s plexus (arrow) (A,B). Increased numbers of grains are also seen associated
with the epithelial layer (C,D). Furthermore,
ileal segments exposed simultaneously to labeled and excess unlabeled
hexapeptide at 37ºC for 30 min (E,F) also exhibited relatively large numbers of
silver grains over the smooth muscle layers of the ileum. Magnification bar = 100 µm.
FYI. The content on this blog is copyright protected © by the author. Feel free to read, copy, and disseminate the studies described here, but please indicate the origin of the work by citing this blog URL as an electronic web citation when it is appropriate to recognize and attribute the work of others.
FYI. The content on this blog is copyright protected © by the author. Feel free to read, copy, and disseminate the studies described here, but please indicate the origin of the work by citing this blog URL as an electronic web citation when it is appropriate to recognize and attribute the work of others.
No comments:
Post a Comment